LR1 नमस्कार ला रेसीडेंसीया फ़्रेंड्स

 

सभी ला रेसीडेंसीया मित्रों  को नमस्कार 

मैं अनिल प्रसाद श्रीवास्तव ला रेसीडेंसीया  मे tower 31 के फ्लैट  701 का खरीददार हूँ । अभी जबलपुर मे  सरकारी सेवा मे हूँ। 

मैंने आपलोगों के सम्मिलित प्रयासों से निकले निष्कर्षों को एक स्थान  पर रखने और आसानी से  ढूँढने  के लिए अपने ब्लॉग मे ये नया पेज खोला है। 

यह इसलिये आवश्यक था क्योंकि व्हाट्सऐप मे आपसे डिस्कशन इतनी जगह ले लेते हैं की काम की चीज अगर ढूँढ़नी हो तो मुश्किल हो जाती है .

यह एक सम्मिलित अभियान है और हर किसी को अपनी क्षमता के अनुसार अपने उपलब्ध समय मे इसमे कुछ लिखना है । आप कमेन्ट बॉक्स मे लिखें,  मैं उसे आवश्यकतानुसार एक पोस्ट बनाकर अलग से कॉपी पेस्ट कर सकता हूँ , अगर आपका कमेन्ट बड़ा हुआ । 

मैंने अपनी तरफ से ये जिम्मा लिया है की सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे जो सुनवाइयाँ इस केस मे हुई हैं उन्मे से जो आज हमारे काम की हैं उन्हे लगातार यहाँ  लगाता जाऊं । साथ ही किसी अखबार  या मीडिया या कहीं भी कुछ संबंधित मैटर मिला तो डालता जाऊंगा .आप को भी कहीं  कुछ ऐसा मिले तो मुझे eranil@yahoo.com पर मेल कर दें मैं उसे यहाँ एक नया पोस्ट बनाकर आपके साभार लिख दूंगा .

साथ ही आप अपने कमेन्ट बॉक मे जो लिखेंगे वो भी जानकारी ढूँढने का प्रयास करूंगा । 

जैसा की मुझे रमेश जी से ज्ञात हुआ है , ला रेसीडेंटया के कुछ मित्रों द्वारा जो IA फाइल किया गया है उसे बिक्रम चटर्जी के केस के साथ मिलाकर सुप्रीम कोर्ट मे सुना जा रहा है । 

अभी मुझे ये ढूँढना है की अबतक हुई 69 सुनवाइयों मे से किस  तारीख को हमारे  हिस्से की सुनवाई हुई है और उसमे  क्या फैसला रहा । 

इसके लिए मैं सबसे पहले उन तारीखों की लिस्ट को आपके सामने रख रहा हूँ। आप अपनी याददाश्त और समझ से संभावित तारीखें suggest  करें ताकि मुझे कम मेहनत करनी पड़े । 



Comments

  1. UnknownAugust 8, 2020 at 10:04 PM

    Great efforts .Go ahead .We are with you.We want justice

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nasimuddin AnsariAugust 8, 2020 at 10:35 PM

    Anil, Good work. it wil be great if you can take some text from group discussion and knit in blog. Kindly keep in mind that some information may be used by corrupt looter builder to be used in their favor ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anil ShrivastavaAugust 8, 2020 at 10:40 PM

      Thank you sir .I have already started a post named " recent informative posts in which I am pasting all such information.I will take care not to post any such information which can harm us. However If i post something which may benefit the rivals please alert me I will delete it immediately.

      Delete
  3. UnknownAugust 8, 2020 at 11:28 PM

    Really appreciating, we should make an RWA to file a case to transfer our Project to NBCC, we're already quite late.
    Brij Mohan Sharma
    T37/1002

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownAugust 9, 2020 at 2:16 AM

    Good initiatives sir

    Raghvendra Kumar
    Mumbai

    T 32/404

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LR 22 Why do I consider Tower-wise construction as illegal and unethical

  There are 7 reasons for which I consider the Tower-wise construction adopted by La Residentia Developers , as illegal It violates the original agreement's payment  condition which specifies how much money is to be paid at what stage of construction. The buyer under this new arrangement is paying advance instalment of Rs. 2 lakh approx which the builder should treat as a loan and pay interest thereupon.Also bankers who are releasing loan instalment should acknowledge that there cannot be two agreements between the same builder-buyer for the same flat.Those who want a new agreement have to cancel the old one. Bankers have followed original agreements and demand letters as per progress of work as basis for payment. Now , suddenly they are disbursing loan without any work being done. It also makes them unsafe. But the bankers are under influence of builder's money and completely ignoring this basis requirement of security for loan.This violation of agreement should be taken cogn...
Read more

LR 26 : Delay in delivery of reserved order is not a bad sign

    Today I saw another sign of worry and disappointment from one of our members, Shri Deepak Kumar. He expressed his disappointment over delay in delivery of reserved order on La Residentia by the honourable supreme court. I felt that I should express what I know and what I feel so that his worries may be reduced. I have told most of my points earlier also, adding only a few today. Since my old post is lost among a series of other posts, this time I decided to post on blog so as to keep it readily available as and when required or searched . It is a common query of most of   members as to what is happening in supreme court and when will the reserved decision will be delivered.Also, what is the next date. The next date is fixed on 22-3-2021. Since order was reserved on our issue of 8 feb 2021, hearing has been done on 22/2/21,4/3/21 and 5/3/21 dates. As I have already written there are many issues to be resolved, in the Amrapali case. As we all know supreme co...
Read more

LR 24 : How to oppose tower wise proposal in limited time during Supreme court hearing

  Many of our members want that our advocate should be told to strongly oppose the process of tower wise construction. I have also written scattered blogs against tower-wise construction. Here,in short, I am trying to summarize the most significant   points so that our advocate may pick what he feels useful for telling in court 1.        Builder has no financial capacity to complete tower wise construction even if some innocents buyers are ready to give all balance amount in advance. This is evident from the following facts : a.        The payment from buyer side is hardly 10% of the total fund requirement. If claims he can add 90% , where is the money? If there is money why is he requesting SC to lift ban from selling 632 units which he already has admitted that belong to Stunning Construction. In this regard Rameshji has added that prior to 23-7-2017, when all 632 were under him , why did he not try to use the...
Read more