LR 8 : Basic details of the Amrapali case and La Residentia

 



रेरा के रिकार्ड में ला रेसीडेंसी या 


Supreme Court case
name of case : Bikram Chatterjee vs Union Of India
Diary No. 30157/2017
filed on 20-9-2017

Amrapali payment plan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-49YqvM-lw&t=21s

Receiver regarding

Media report on SC judgement 23 July 2019https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INxDhp_USFU

15 march 2018 Advocate Lahoti given power to hold a meeting of all buyers for making a consensus about the various cases running parallelly for the similar problems in different  projects of different builders https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2bY3qa-j70



Contact CR for the resolution of your queries.


Court Receiver
Sri. R. Venkatramani
H. No. C- 240
Sector- 44
Noida- 201301.

7838869799 Assist Praveen
9818280081 Assist Shivraman
9810455328 Ramani sir

Portal https://receiveramrapali.in/
Mail:- rv_ramani@hotmail.com
Next date of hearing 19-8-2020

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LR 22 Why do I consider Tower-wise construction as illegal and unethical

  There are 7 reasons for which I consider the Tower-wise construction adopted by La Residentia Developers , as illegal It violates the original agreement's payment  condition which specifies how much money is to be paid at what stage of construction. The buyer under this new arrangement is paying advance instalment of Rs. 2 lakh approx which the builder should treat as a loan and pay interest thereupon.Also bankers who are releasing loan instalment should acknowledge that there cannot be two agreements between the same builder-buyer for the same flat.Those who want a new agreement have to cancel the old one. Bankers have followed original agreements and demand letters as per progress of work as basis for payment. Now , suddenly they are disbursing loan without any work being done. It also makes them unsafe. But the bankers are under influence of builder's money and completely ignoring this basis requirement of security for loan.This violation of agreement should be taken cogn...
Read more

LR 26 : Delay in delivery of reserved order is not a bad sign

    Today I saw another sign of worry and disappointment from one of our members, Shri Deepak Kumar. He expressed his disappointment over delay in delivery of reserved order on La Residentia by the honourable supreme court. I felt that I should express what I know and what I feel so that his worries may be reduced. I have told most of my points earlier also, adding only a few today. Since my old post is lost among a series of other posts, this time I decided to post on blog so as to keep it readily available as and when required or searched . It is a common query of most of   members as to what is happening in supreme court and when will the reserved decision will be delivered.Also, what is the next date. The next date is fixed on 22-3-2021. Since order was reserved on our issue of 8 feb 2021, hearing has been done on 22/2/21,4/3/21 and 5/3/21 dates. As I have already written there are many issues to be resolved, in the Amrapali case. As we all know supreme co...
Read more

LR 24 : How to oppose tower wise proposal in limited time during Supreme court hearing

  Many of our members want that our advocate should be told to strongly oppose the process of tower wise construction. I have also written scattered blogs against tower-wise construction. Here,in short, I am trying to summarize the most significant   points so that our advocate may pick what he feels useful for telling in court 1.        Builder has no financial capacity to complete tower wise construction even if some innocents buyers are ready to give all balance amount in advance. This is evident from the following facts : a.        The payment from buyer side is hardly 10% of the total fund requirement. If claims he can add 90% , where is the money? If there is money why is he requesting SC to lift ban from selling 632 units which he already has admitted that belong to Stunning Construction. In this regard Rameshji has added that prior to 23-7-2017, when all 632 were under him , why did he not try to use the...
Read more